Proof mode¶
Proof mode is used to prove theorems.
Coq enters proof mode when you begin a proof,
such as with the Theorem
command. It exits proof mode when
you complete a proof, such as with the Qed
command. Tactics,
which are available only in proof mode, incrementally transform incomplete
proofs to eventually generate a complete proof.
When you run Coq interactively, such as through CoqIDE, Proof General or
coqtop, Coq shows the current proof state (the incomplete proof) as you
enter tactics. This information isn't shown when you run Coq in batch
mode with coqc
.
Proof State¶
The proof state consists of one or more unproven goals. Each goal has a conclusion (the statement that is to be proven) and a local context, which contains named hypotheses (which are propositions), variables and local definitions that can be used in proving the conclusion. The proof may also use constants from the global environment such as definitions and proven theorems.
(Note that conclusion is also used to refer to the last part of an implication.
For example, in A > B > C
, A
and B
are premises and C
is the conclusion.)
The term "goal" may refer to an entire goal or to the conclusion of a goal, depending on the context.
The conclusion appears below a line and the local context appears above the line.
The conclusion is a type. Each item in the local context begins with a name
and ends, after a colon, with an associated type.
Local definitions
are shown in the form n := 0 : nat
, for example, in which nat
is the
type of 0
.
The local context of a goal contains items specific to the goal as well as sectionlocal variables and hypotheses (see Assumptions) defined in the current section. The latter are included in the initial proof state. Items in the local context are ordered; an item can only refer to items that appear before it. (A more mathematical description of the local context is here.)
The global environment has definitions and proven theorems that are global in scope. (A more mathematical description of the global environment is here.)
When you begin proving a theorem, the proof state shows the statement of the theorem below the line and often nothing in the local context:
 Parameter P: nat > Prop.
 P is declared
 Goal forall n m: nat, n > m > P 1 /\ P 2.
 1 goal ============================ forall n m : nat, n > m > P 1 /\ P 2
After applying the intros
tactic, we see hypotheses above the line.
The names of variables (n
and m
) and hypotheses (H
) appear before a colon, followed by
the type they represent.
 intros.
 1 goal n, m : nat H : n > m ============================ P 1 /\ P 2
Some tactics, such as split
, create new goals, which may
be referred to as subgoals for clarity.
Goals are numbered from 1 to N at each step of the proof to permit applying a
tactic to specific goals. The local context is only shown for the first goal.
 split.
 2 goals n, m : nat H : n > m ============================ P 1 goal 2 is: P 2
"Variables" may refer specifically to local context items for which the type of their type
is Set
or Type
, and "hypotheses" refers to items that are
propositions,
for which the type of their type is Prop
or SProp
,
but these terms are also used interchangeably.
 let t_n := type of n in idtac "type of n :" t_n; let tt_n := type of t_n in idtac "type of" t_n ":" tt_n.
 type of n : nat type of nat : Set
 let t_H := type of H in idtac "type of H :" t_H; let tt_H := type of t_H in idtac "type of" t_H ":" tt_H.
 type of H : (n > m) type of (n > m) : Prop
A proof script, consisting of the tactics that are applied to prove a theorem, is often informally referred to as a "proof". The real proof, whether complete or incomplete, is the associated term, the proof term, which users may occasionally want to examine. (This is based on the CurryHoward isomorphism [How80][Bar81][GLT89][Hue89], which is a correspondence between between proofs and terms and between propositions and types of λcalculus. The isomorphism is also sometimes called the "propositionsastypes correspondence".)
The Show Proof
command displays the incomplete proof term
before you've completed the proof. For example, here's the proof
term after using the split
tactic above:
 Show Proof.
 (fun (n m : nat) (H : n > m) => conj ?Goal ?Goal0)
The incomplete parts, the goals, are represented by
existential variables
with names that begin with ?Goal
. The Show Existentials
command
shows each existential with the hypotheses and conclusion for the associated goal.
 Show Existentials.
 Existential 1 = ?Goal : [n : nat m : nat H : n > m  P 1] Existential 2 = ?Goal0 : [n : nat m : nat H : n > m  P 2]
Coq's kernel verifies the correctness of proof terms when it exits proof mode by checking that the proof term is welltyped and that its type is the same as the theorem statement.
After a proof is completed, Print
<theorem_name>
shows the proof term and its type. The type appears after
the colon (forall ...
), as for this theorem from Coq's standard library:
 Print proj1.
 Fetching opaque proofs from disk for Coq.Init.Logic proj1 = fun (A B : Prop) (H : A /\ B) => match H with  conj x x0 => (fun (H0 : A) (_ : B) => H0) x x0 end : forall A B : Prop, A /\ B > A Arguments proj1 [A B]%type_scope _
Note
Many tactics accept term
s as arguments and frequently
refer to them with wording such as "the type of term
".
When term
is the name of a theorem or lemma, this wording
refers to the type of the proof term, which is what's given in the
Theorem
statement. When term
is the name of a hypothesis,
the wording refers to the type shown in the context for the hypothesis
(i.e., after the colon).
For terms that are more complex than just an ident
,
you can use Check
term
to display their type.
Entering and exiting proof mode¶
Coq enters proof mode when you begin a proof through
commands such as Theorem
or Goal
. Coq user interfaces
usually have a way to indicate that you're in proof mode.
Tactics are available only in proof mode (currently they give syntax errors outside of proof mode). Most commands can be used both in and out of proof mode, but some commands only work in or outside of proof mode.
When the proof is completed, you can exit proof mode with commands such as
Qed
, Defined
and Save
.

Command
Goal type
¶ Asserts an unnamed proposition. This is intended for quick tests that a proposition is provable. If the proof is eventually completed and validated, you can assign a name with the
Save
orDefined
commands. If no name is given, the name will beUnnamed_thm
(or, if that name is already defined, a variant of that).

Command
Qed
¶ Passes a completed proof term to Coq's kernel to check that the proof term is welltyped and to verify that its type matches the theorem statement. If it's verified, the proof term is added to the global environment as an opaque constant using the declared name from the original goal.
It's very rare for a proof term to fail verification. Generally this indicates a bug in a tactic you used or that you misused some unsafe tactics.

Error
Attempt to save an incomplete proof.
¶

Error
No focused proof (No proofediting in progress).
¶ You tried to use a proof mode command such as
Qed
outside of proof mode.
Note
Sometimes an error occurs when building the proof term, because tactics do not enforce completely the term construction constraints.
The user should also be aware of the fact that since the proof term is completely rechecked at this point, one may have to wait a while when the proof is large. In some exceptional cases one may even incur a memory overflow.

Error

Command
Save ident
¶ Similar to
Qed
, except that the proof term is added to the global context with the nameident
, which overrides any name provided by theTheorem
command or its variants.

Command
Defined ident?
¶ Similar to
Qed
andSave
, except the proof is made transparent, which means that its content can be explicitly used for type checking and that it can be unfolded in conversion tactics (see Applying conversion rules,Opaque
,Transparent
). Ifident
is specified, the proof is defined with the given name, which overrides any name provided by theTheorem
command or its variants.

Command
Admitted
¶ This command is available in proof mode to give up the current proof and declare the initial goal as an axiom.

Command
Abort All?
¶ Aborts the current proof. If the current proof is a nested proof, the previous proof becomes current. If
All
is given, all nested proofs are aborted. SeeNested Proofs Allowed
.All
Aborts all current proofs.

Error
No focused proof (No proofediting in progress).
¶

Command
Proof term
¶ This command applies in proof mode. It is equivalent to
exact term. Qed.
That is, you have to give the full proof in one gulp, as a proof term (see Section Applying theorems).Warning
Use of this command is discouraged. In particular, it doesn't work in Proof General because it must immediately follow the command that opened proof mode, but Proof General inserts
Unset
Silent
before it (see Proof General issue #498).

Command
Proof
¶ Is a noop which is useful to delimit the sequence of tactic commands which start a proof, after a
Theorem
command. It is a good practice to useProof
as an opening parenthesis, closed in the script with a closingQed
.See also

Command
Proof using section_var_expr with ltac_expr?
¶  section_var_expr
::=
starred_ident_ref*
? section_var_expr50section_var_expr50
::=
section_var_expr0  section_var_expr0
section_var_expr0 + section_var_expr0
section_var_expr0section_var_expr0
::=
starred_ident_ref
()
( section_var_expr ) *?starred_ident_ref
::=
ident *?
Type *?
AllOpens proof mode, declaring the set of section variables (see Assumptions) used by the proof. At
Qed
time, the system verifies that the set of section variables used in the proof is a subset of the declared one.The set of declared variables is closed under type dependency. For example, if
T
is a variable anda
is a variable of typeT
, then the commandsProof using a
andProof using T a
are equivalent.The set of declared variables always includes the variables used by the statement. In other words
Proof using e
is equivalent toProof using Type + e
for any declaration expressione
. section_var_expr50
Use all section variables except those specified by
section_var_expr50
section_var_expr0 + section_var_expr0
Use section variables from the union of both collections. See Name a set of section hypotheses for Proof using to see how to form a named collection.
section_var_expr0  section_var_expr0
Use section variables which are in the first collection but not in the second one.
*?
Use the transitive closure of the specified collection.
Type
Use only section variables occurring in the statement. Specifying
*
uses the forward transitive closure of all the section variables occurring in the statement. For example, if the variableH
has typep < 5
thenH
is inp*
sincep
occurs in the type ofH
.All
Use all section variables.

Warning
ident is both name of a Collection and Variable, Collection ident takes precedence over Variable.
¶ If a specified name is ambiguous (it could be either a
Collection
or aVariable
), then it is assumed to be aCollection
name.

Warning
Variable All is shadowed by Collection named All containing all variables.
¶ This is variant of the previous warning for the All collection.
See also

Attribute
using
¶ This attribute can be applied to the
Definition
,Example
,Fixpoint
andCoFixpoint
commands as well as toLemma
and its variants. It takes asection_var_expr
, in quotes, as its value. This is equivalent to specifying the samesection_var_expr
inProof using
.Example
 Section Test.
 Variable n : nat.
 n is declared
 Hypothesis Hn : n <> 0.
 Hn is declared
 #[using="Hn"] Lemma example : 0 < n.
 1 goal n : nat Hn : n <> 0 ============================ 0 < n
 Abort.
 End Test.
Proof using options¶
The following options modify the behavior of Proof using
.

Option
Default Proof Using "section_var_expr"
¶ Set this option to use
section_var_expr
as the defaultProof using
value. E.g.Set Default Proof Using "a b"
will complete allProof
commands not followed by ausing
part withusing a b
.
Name a set of section hypotheses for Proof using
¶

Command
Collection ident := section_var_expr
¶ This can be used to name a set of section hypotheses, with the purpose of making
Proof using
annotations more compact.Example
Define the collection named
Some
containingx
,y
andz
:Collection Some := x y z.
Define the collection named
Fewer
containing onlyx
andy
:Collection Fewer := Some  z
Define the collection named
Many
containing the set union or set difference ofFewer
andSome
:Collection Many := Fewer + Some Collection Many := Fewer  Some
Define the collection named
Many
containing the set difference ofFewer
and the unnamed collectionx y
:Collection Many := Fewer  (x y)
Deprecated since version 8.15: Redefining a collection, defining a collection with the same name as a variable, and invoking the
Proof using
command when collection and variable names overlap are deprecated. See the warnings below and in theProof using
command.
Error
"All" is a predefined collection containing all variables. It can't be redefined.
¶ When issuing a
Proof using
command, All used as a collection name always means "use all variables".

Warning
New Collection definition of ident shadows the previous one.
¶ Redefining a
Collection
overwrites the previous definition.

Warning
ident was already a defined Variable, the name ident will refer to Collection when executing "Proof using" command.
¶ The
Proof using
command allows specifying bothCollection
andVariable
names. In case of ambiguity, a name is assumed to be Collection name.

Error
Proof modes¶
When entering proof mode through commands such as Goal
and Proof
,
Coq picks by default the L
_{tac} mode. Nonetheless, there exist other proof modes
shipped in the standard Coq installation, and furthermore some plugins define
their own proof modes. The default proof mode used when opening a proof can
be changed using the following option.

Option
Default Proof Mode string
¶ This option selects the proof mode to use when starting a proof. Depending on the proof mode, various syntactic constructs are allowed when writing a proof. All proof modes support commands; the proof mode determines which tactic language and set of tactic definitions are available. The possible option values are:
"Classic"
Activates the
L
_{tac} language and the tactics with the syntax documented in this manual. Some tactics are not available until the associated plugin is loaded, such asSSR
ormicromega
. This proof mode is set when the prelude is loaded."Noedit"
No tactic language is activated at all. This is the default when the prelude is not loaded, e.g. through the
noinit
option forcoqc
."Ltac2"
Activates the Ltac2 language and the Ltac2specific variants of the documented tactics. This value is only available after
Requiring
Ltac2.Importing
Ltac2 sets this mode.
Some external plugins also define their own proof mode, which can be activated with this command.
Proving a subgoal as a separate lemma: abstract¶

Tactic
abstract ltac_expr2 using ident_{name}?
¶ Does a
solve
[ ltac_expr2 ]
and saves the subproof as an auxiliary lemma. ifident_{name}
is specified, the lemma is saved with that name; otherwise the lemma is saved with the nameident
_subproof
natural?
whereident
is the name of the current goal (e.g. the theorem name) andnatural
is chosen to get a fresh name. If the proof is closed withQed
, the auxiliary lemma is inlined in the final proof term.This is useful with tactics such as
discriminate
that generate huge proof terms with many intermediate goals. It can significantly reduce peak memory use. In most cases it doesn't have a significant impact on run time. One case in which it can reduce run time is when a tacticfoo
is known to always pass type checking when it succeeds, such as in reflective proofs. In this case, the idiom "abstract
exact_no_check
foo
" will save half the type checking type time compared to "exact
foo
".Warning
The abstract tactic, while very useful, still has some known limitations. See #9146 for more details. We recommend caution when using it in some "nonstandard" contexts. In particular,
abstract
doesn't work properly when used inside quotationsltac:(...)
. If used as part of typeclass resolution, it may produce incorrect terms when in polymorphic universe mode.Warning
Provide
ident_{name}
at your own risk; explicitly named and reused subterms don’t play well with asynchronous proofs.
Tactic
transparent_abstract ltac_expr3 using ident?
¶ Like
abstract
, but save the subproof in a transparent lemma with a name in the formident
_subterm
natural?
.Warning
Use this feature at your own risk; building computationally relevant terms with tactics is fragile, and explicitly named and reused subterms don’t play well with asynchronous proofs.

Error
Proof is not complete.
¶

Error

Tactic
Requesting information¶

Command
Show identnatural?
¶ Displays the current goals.
natural
Display only the
natural
th goal.ident
Displays the named goal
ident
. This is useful in particular to display a shelved goal but only works if the corresponding existential variable has been named by the user (see Existential variables) as in the following example.Example
 Goal exists n, n = 0.
 1 goal ============================ exists n : nat, n = 0
 eexists ?[n].
 1 focused goal (shelved: 1) ============================ ?n = 0
 Show n.
 goal n is: ============================ nat

Error
No focused proof.
¶

Error
No such goal.
¶

Command
Show Proof Diffs removed??
¶ Displays the proof term generated by the tactics that have been applied so far. If the proof is incomplete, the term will contain holes, which correspond to subterms which are still to be constructed. Each hole is an existential variable, which appears as a question mark followed by an identifier.
Specifying “Diffs” highlights the difference between the current and previous proof step. By default, the command shows the output once with additions highlighted. Including “removed” shows the output twice: once showing removals and once showing additions. It does not examine the
Diffs
option. See "Show Proof" differences.

Command
Show Conjectures
¶ Prints the names of all the theorems that are currently being proved. As it is possible to start proving a previous lemma during the proof of a theorem, there may be multiple names.

Command
Show Intro
¶ If the current goal begins by at least one product, prints the name of the first product as it would be generated by an anonymous
intro
. The aim of this command is to ease the writing of more robust scripts. For example, with an appropriate Proof General macro, it is possible to transform any anonymousintro
into a qualified one such asintro y13
. In the case of a nonproduct goal, it prints nothing.

Command
Show Existentials
¶ Displays all open goals / existential variables in the current proof along with the context and type of each variable.

Command
Show Match qualid
¶ Displays a template of the Gallina
match
construct with a branch for each constructor of the typequalid
. This is used internally by companycoq.Example
 Show Match nat.
 match # with  O =>  S x => end

Error
Unknown inductive type.
¶

Command
Show Universes
¶ Displays the set of all universe constraints and its normalized form at the current stage of the proof, useful for debugging universe inconsistencies.

Command
Show Goal natural at natural
¶ Available in coqtop. Displays a goal at a proof state using the goal ID number and the proof state ID number. It is primarily for use by tools such as Prooftree that need to fetch goal history in this way. Prooftree is a tool for visualizing a proof as a tree that runs in Proof General.

Command
Guarded
¶ Some tactics (e.g.
refine
) allow to build proofs using fixpoint or cofixpoint constructions. Due to the incremental nature of proof construction, the check of the termination (or guardedness) of the recursive calls in the fixpoint or cofixpoint constructions is postponed to the time of the completion of the proof.The command
Guarded
allows checking if the guard condition for fixpoint and cofixpoint is violated at some time of the construction of the proof without having to wait the completion of the proof.
Showing differences between proof steps¶
Coq can automatically highlight the differences between successive proof steps
and between values in some error messages. Coq can also highlight differences
in the proof term.
For example, the following screenshots of CoqIDE and coqtop show the application
of the same intros
tactic. The tactic creates two new hypotheses, highlighted in green.
The conclusion is entirely in pale green because although it’s changed, no tokens were added
to it. The second screenshot uses the "removed" option, so it shows the conclusion a
second time with the old text, with deletions marked in red. Also, since the hypotheses are
new, no line of old text is shown for them.
This image shows an error message with diff highlighting in CoqIDE:
How to enable diffs¶

Option
Diffs "on""off""removed"
¶ This option is used to enable diffs. The “on” setting highlights added tokens in green, while the “removed” setting additionally reprints items with removed tokens in red. Unchanged tokens in modified items are shown with pale green or red. Diffs in error messages use red and green for the compared values; they appear regardless of the setting. (Colors are userconfigurable.)
For coqtop, showing diffs can be enabled when starting coqtop with the
diffs onoffremoved
commandline option or by setting the Diffs
option
within Coq. You will need to provide the color onauto
commandline option when
you start coqtop in either case.
Colors for coqtop can be configured by setting the COQ_COLORS
environment
variable. See section By environment variables. Diffs
use the tags diff.added
, diff.added.bg
, diff.removed
and diff.removed.bg
.
In CoqIDE, diffs should be enabled from the View
menu. Don’t use the Set Diffs
command in CoqIDE. You can change the background colors shown for diffs from the
Edit  Preferences  Tags
panel by changing the settings for the diff.added
,
diff.added.bg
, diff.removed
and diff.removed.bg
tags. This panel also
lets you control other attributes of the highlights, such as the foreground
color, bold, italic, underline and strikeout.
Proof General, VsCoq and Coqtail can also display Coqgenerated proof diffs automatically. Please see the PG documentation section "Showing Proof Diffs" and Coqtail's "Proof Diffs" for details.
How diffs are calculated¶
Diffs are calculated as follows:
Select the old proof state to compare to, which is the proof state before the last tactic that changed the proof. Changes that only affect the view of the proof, such as
all: swap 1 2
, are ignored.For each goal in the new proof state, determine what old goal to compare it to—the one it is derived from or is the same as. Match the hypotheses by name (order is ignored), handling compacted items specially.
For each hypothesis and conclusion (the “items”) in each goal, pass them as strings to the lexer to break them into tokens. Then apply the Myers diff algorithm [Mye86] on the tokens and add appropriate highlighting.
Notes:
Aside from the highlights, output for the "on" option should be identical to the undiffed output.
Goals completed in the last proof step will not be shown even with the "removed" setting.
This screenshot shows the result of applying a split
tactic that replaces one goal
with 2 goals. Notice that the goal P 1
is not highlighted at all after
the split because it has not changed.
Diffs may appear like this after applying a intro
tactic that results
in a compacted hypotheses:
"Show Proof" differences¶
To show differences in the proof term:
In coqtop and Proof General, use the
Show Proof
Diffs
command.In CoqIDE, position the cursor on or just after a tactic to compare the proof term after the tactic with the proof term before the tactic, then select
View / Show Proof
from the menu or enter the associated key binding. Differences will be shown applying the currentShow Diffs
setting from theView
menu. If the current setting isDon't show diffs
, diffs will not be shown.Output with the "added and removed" option looks like this:
Delaying solving unification constraints¶

Tactic
solve_constraints
¶

Flag
Solve Unification Constraints
¶ By default, after each tactic application, postponed typechecking unification problems are resolved using heuristics. Unsetting this flag disables this behavior, allowing tactics to leave unification constraints unsolved. Use the
solve_constraints
tactic at any point to solve the constraints.
Proof maintenance¶
Experimental. Many tactics, such as intros
, can automatically generate names, such
as "H0" or "H1" for a new hypothesis introduced from a goal. Subsequent proof steps
may explicitly refer to these names. However, future versions of Coq may not assign
names exactly the same way, which could cause the proof to fail because the
new names don't match the explicit references in the proof.
The following Mangle Names
settings let users find all the
places where proofs rely on automatically generated names, which can
then be named explicitly to avoid any incompatibility. These
settings cause Coq to generate different names, producing errors for
references to automatically generated names.

Flag
Mangle Names
¶ When this flag is set (it is off by default), generated names use the prefix specified in the following option instead of the default prefix.

Flag
Mangle Names Light
¶ When this flag is set (it is off by default), the names generated by
Mangle Names
only add theMangle Names Prefix
to the original name.
Controlling proof mode¶

Option
Hyps Limit natural
¶ This option controls the maximum number of hypotheses displayed in goals after the application of a tactic. All the hypotheses remain usable in the proof development. When unset, it goes back to the default mode which is to print all available hypotheses.

Flag
Nested Proofs Allowed
¶ When turned on (it is off by default), this flag enables support for nested proofs: a new assertion command can be inserted before the current proof is finished, in which case Coq will temporarily switch to the proof of this nested lemma. When the proof of the nested lemma is finished (with
Qed
orDefined
), its statement will be made available (as if it had been proved before starting the previous proof) and Coq will switch back to the proof of the previous assertion.
Controlling memory usage¶

Command
Print Debug GC
¶ Prints heap usage statistics, which are values from the
stat
type of theGc
module described here in the OCaml documentation. Thelive_words
,heap_words
andtop_heap_words
values give the basic information. Words are 8 bytes or 4 bytes, respectively, for 64 and 32bit executables.
When experiencing high memory usage the following commands can be used to force Coq to optimize some of its internal data structures.

Command
Optimize Proof
¶ Shrink the data structure used to represent the current proof.

Command
Optimize Heap
¶ Perform a heap compaction. This is generally an expensive operation. See: OCaml Gc.compact There is also an analogous tactic
optimize_heap
.
Memory usage parameters can be set through the OCAMLRUNPARAM environment variable.